���ճԹ�

When considering natural hazards in a riverine or catchment setting, it is often high-magnitude flood events that grab the headlines.��In comparison, associated catchment hazards such as river scour are often overlooked, but these events can be no less costly in their societal and economic impacts.��Recent studies have shown that, in the UK, river erosion and associated impacts exacerbate flood damage by £336 million a year and are a considerable source of water pollutants, costing £238 million a year to remediate.River erosion further increases the costs of water treatment and maintenance of drainage networks by £132 million a year and accounts for 25 per cent of valid subsidence insurance claims (Li et al., 2021; Pritchard et al., 2013).

Infrastructure damage

Scour causes physical modification to riverbeds and banks via the removal of sediment or engineered materials. It occurs when the forces imposed by the flow of water on a sediment particle exceed the stabilising forces (Kirby et al., 2015).  This is an environmental process occurring in response to the natural variability of river stream flows and sediment regimes but, unlike hazards associated with flood waters that will eventually recede, the changes that result from river erosion can be permanent.This makes river scour extremely damaging when it intersects assets such as farmland, infrastructure, residences, historic sites, etc.

Of particular concern is the significant damage river scour can cause to infrastructure adjacent to rivers, such as bridges, flood defences and electricity pylons. The Climate Change Committee’s recent, independent assessment of UK climate risk has highlighted that the risk to bridges and pipelines from future erosion requires further investigation.

Currently, river scour risk to UK railway bridges is estimated to cause the loss of 8.2 million passenger journeys each year, with an accompanying economic cost of up to £60 million (Lamb et al., 2019). In 2009, flood events in Cumbria caused a tragic fatality and the partial or total destruction of 20 road bridges, costing the local economy an estimated £2 million per week during the recovery period (Pizarro et al., 2020).

Events such as these serve as a stark and increasingly frequent reminder of the destructive effects of river scour. As a result, the ability to predict where river scour is likely to occur across the UK river network is being recognised as increasingly important, both under current conditions and future climate change scenarios. The UK Government Environment Act (2021) has a target to reduce the impact of physical modification on the water environment and, between 2009 and 2015, £68 million was spent towards reaching this goal (UK Government, 2021).

Maintaining catchment health

Management and mitigation against river erosion is required at multiple scales and concerns a variety of stakeholders. Organisations involved in the maintenance of catchment health include:

• river basin and catchment management authorities
• charities such as the National Trust and various river trusts
• environmental protection agencies
• national park authorities

At a more granular level, the occurrence of river erosion is of interest to asset owners responsible for infrastructure, such as rail or road networks, local planning authorities and insurers, and lenders and property search companies when considering risks to assets, future developments and portfolios.

Efforts to model this costly geohazard have highlighted an important gap in available datasets. The joint efforts of the Environment Agency (EA), the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and Natural Resource Wales (NRW) on the ‘’ flagged: ‘There is currently no nationwide information showing where erosion or deposition is likely to occur’, whilst a UK Climate Resilience Programme (UKCRP)-funded project, ‘’, found: ‘Creating resilient, sustainable infrastructure depends on understanding the potential future risks of changing erosion hazards and their impact. Yet at present, no predictive modelling framework exists for erosion hazard.’

The role of geological data

The geological properties of bedrock and superficial deposits that make up riverbeds and banks are fundamental controls on the susceptibility of any given river reach to scouring. As such, geological data is a key input into any predictive models attempting to resolve this issue and is an invaluable resource for infrastructure risk and catchment health assessments at both catchment and reach scales.

Existing modelling efforts by the UK’s environmental protection agencies and the wider scientific community utilise various ���ճԹ� data holdings. For example, the UKCRP project derives sediment compositions from the ���ճԹ� soils texture maps, whilst Defra, EA and NRW are considering the use of ���ճԹ� superficial deposits data as indication of the location of erodible deposits. Both have limitations: the latter project fails to consider erodible or soluble bedrock deposits and the former acknowledges that it lacks ‘sufficient information on the spatial variation in these [sediment] compositions’. This emphasises the need for consistent information on the erodibility of riverbed and bank material at national and granular levels.

Stay tuned for our upcoming blog to find out how ���ճԹ�’s updated GeoScour data product can provide geological river scour assessments from catchment down to individual reach scale with national coverage.

Join the ���ճԹ� GeoScour dataset webinar: 8 September 2022

���ճԹ� Product Development invites you to the launch of our newly updated dataset, GeoScour. Our 30-minute webinar will give an overview of river scour and its associated river erosion hazards, including surface geology susceptibility and bedrock geology susceptibility, and will be followed by an introduction to the Open and Premium GeoScour data packages.

About the author

Rob Shaw

Geospatial data analyst

���ճԹ� Keyworth

Find out more